Higher scores indicate a smoother, more positive interview experience with professional staff, organized logistics, and a supportive environment.
Based on 42 responses
Score Reference:
9โ10 Exceptional8โ8.9 Very Good7โ7.9 Good6โ6.9 Mixed< 6 Needs Improvement
The SDN Interview Experience Score (SIES) is a composite metric that represents applicants overall impressions of their interview experience, based on multiple factors such as professionalism, facilities, responsiveness, and stress levels.
What was the stress level of the interview?
Most respondents rated their interview as average stress.
How do you rank this school among ALL other schools?
Most respondents rank this school above all other schools.
How did the interview impress you?
Most respondents felt positively about their interview.
Positively (89%)
No change (11%)
How you think you did?
Most respondents thought they performed well at the interview.
Great (25%)
Good (50%)
Average (25%)
What are your general comments?
Applicants commonly praised the interviewers for being nice and felt the questions were authentic in getting to know them. Many emphasized the importance of being genuine and sharing personal experiences during the interview process.
Interviewers were very nice. Questions are definitely meant to find out who you are as a person. Almost impossible to give fake responses. Best advice is to just be yourself and definitely use every opportunity to talk about your experiences.
DAL-DENT-COMP interviews are an average of 34 minutes, with an average of 2.1 interviews. 56% of interviews are one-on-one, 0% are in-person, and 88% are closed-file.
What is one of the specific questions they asked you?
The most commonly asked interview questions at medical schools include inquiries about handling conflicts, ethical dilemmas, and personal reflections such as "Tell me about yourself" and "Name one thing you would change if you were to step back into the past." Some respondents mentioned scenario-based questions involving plagiarism accusations and resolving conflicts within a group, showing a focus on ethical decision-making and interpersonal skills in the interview process.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Pretend a group member has accused you of plagiarizing your portion of a project. You vehemently deny it and make a scene. Later you realize that you unknowingly did plagiarize. What would you do?
If you were in a research group and were accused of plagiarism on a group project and the you got angry and told the group off then later found out you had plagiarized what would you do? (I know strange huh?)
Students said most interesting question asked at Dalhousie University Faculty of Dentistry discussed various situational scenarios, such as handling disagreements in grading, decision-making in a lab setting, and the impact of missing class. The interview format may have been an MMI (Multiple Mini Interview), and respondents may have been subject to a nondisclosure agreement based on the nature of the questions mentioned.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
If you were a TA for a class and a professor approached you wanting you to evaluate a students examination that was scored by a fellow TA and you didn't agree with the mark, how would you handle the situation?
You are working in an organic chemistry lab trying to synthesize a new chemical. Three colleagues have proposed three different methods, how do you decide which to use.
Applicants commonly prepared for the interview by creating a question bank, practicing speaking with others, doing mock interviews, reviewing possible questions, and researching the school or program. Some also mentioned practicing with past questions, being themselves, and talking to current students for insights.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Prepared question bank. Practiced my speaking with family and friends. Did mock interviews.
Students said most difficult question asked at Dalhousie University Faculty of Dentistry discussed situational scenarios, such as challenging authority and handling personal crises. These responses suggest a focus on assessing problem-solving skills and ethical decision-making in the interview process.
Applicants were positively impressed by the small class size, friendly and helpful faculty, and the clinical focus of the program, including early hands-on experience with patients. The personal and supportive interactions with interviewers, admissions staff, and current students also stood out as a highlight for many applicants.
Top 5 Responses: (Click below to see additional responses)
Ms. Webb is super personable and both Dr. Bannerman and the regional dentist who interviewed were friendly and encouraging. Willingness of admissions staff and current students to act as sources for prospective students. The small class size is a plus for me, as is the fact that Dalhousie is a board testing site with reciprocity with the States.
Applicants commonly mentioned concerns about the distance and complexities of attending school internationally, as well as outdated facilities or negative impressions of the interview environment. Suggestions include addressing logistical challenges for international students and updating facilities to create a more positive impression on prospective students.
Applicants commonly wished they had known in advance about the interview structure, specifically whether it would be CDA structured or closed file. They also expressed a desire for more insight into the program's quality and specifics, such as student-faculty ratio.
I wish I had known it wouldn't be CDA structured questions